------- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-09-17 14:14 ------- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-17 14:11 > ------- > (In reply to comment #9) > > Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures > > > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > > > ------- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 14:04 > > > ------- > > > Dejagnu adds it always for dg-do link/run, and there doesn't seem to be a > > > way > > > to bypass that. > > > > Hm, so I'd say blame it on the host system of HJ. Or alternatively > > As I said, it is a REGRESSION, which means it passed before. > I believe it is caused by your --combine change. See: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2010-09/msg00267.html Of course it is. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702
