http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-03
14:08:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 22251
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22251
gcc46-pr45997.patch
That said, I think this patch should fix this case (while of course not ruling
out other possibilities to get __unknown__ base type; but that really is a
matter of the DWARF wording being relaxed or not) and is IMHO the right thing
to do.
