http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652

--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-17 
14:08:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> P1 sounds a little overrated, it's a specialized option and an artificial 
> test.
> Only IA-64 really uses this thing, right?

All regressions towards the last release on primary or secondary targets
are P1 if they do not involve invalid source or checking-only problems.

Reply via email to