http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46895
--- Comment #5 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 18:49:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Yeah, if #c2 tests what the test meant to test, then it is much preferrable > > over the thing that got committed, which has lots of issues. > > Sorry about the trunk breakage. I reverted the testcase. Yes, it was meant for > x86-64. I'll fix the testcase and repost a patch to the mailing list. > > Reverted in r167756. Update: The test doesn't do what #c3 is doing. The test is supposed to fail with this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=153780 and pass otherwise. That patch limits the alignment to MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT. The test described in #c3 will still pass with that patch. As far as the uninitialized variables are concerned, I can set them all to 0 and it doesn't affect whether the test passes or fails. Can you assign this bug to me? Also, can I submit my patch with the lp64 dejaGNU filter? Thanks!