http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
--- Comment #40 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-14 21:37:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #38) > I posted the fixes, but it should not affect > -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition. > Any idea what is going wrong here? well, unless some interaction from the typo.. (possible) .. AFAICT most of the fallout is multiple definitions of .eh symbols... I was just looking in the debugger .. ... wondering if I can intercept the cold ones and give them different names. ;-)
