http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
--- Comment #43 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2010-12-14 23:21:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) > The patch I had in mind > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01129.html > > The hunk > Index: gcc/opts.c > =================================================================== > --- gcc/opts.c (revision 167793) > +++ gcc/opts.c (working copy) > @@ -723,6 +723,9 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, struct g > opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks = 1; > } > > + if (opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition) > + opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks = 1; > + > /* If user requested unwind info, then turn off the partitioning > optimization. */ > > should be > Index: gcc/opts.c > =================================================================== > --- gcc/opts.c (revision 167793) > +++ gcc/opts.c (working copy) > @@ -723,6 +723,9 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, struct g > opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks = 1; > } > > + if (opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition) > + opts->x_flag_reorder_functions = 1; > + > /* If user requested unwind info, then turn off the partitioning > optimization. */ > > sorry for typo. The cited patch doesn't have any such change in that particular context. Was this entire hunk missing from the posted patch?
