http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2011-01-22 00:33:26 UTC --- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 15:32, dj at redhat dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 > > DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Attachment #23014|0 |1 > is obsolete| | > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED > AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |dj at redhat dot com > |gnu.org | > > --- Comment #8 from DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> 2011-01-21 22:31:37 UTC > --- > Created attachment 23074 > --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23074 > alternate patch 2 > > This one checks to make sure there *is* an immediately preceeding insn. > Better? I'm still quite concerned you're papering over the problem. Can you give a dump immediately before the setcc is removed? Jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNOiXEAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7QYwIAIzmPzqeKqI5wyRACB4F0dLu CeCWykoaGKSP5b/zHNB6eEethxcOKh2VC8vcpLkmaqx7zMGRx3biUAlrz0D/SXZc 0RWlQyPx2j+sUYWZbcNZbfH3b2Osl8AgsC7d3llKJK5zdkR1UYbS2hURodjyb/Y0 OjtyWD0layQQZ9/sCB8yZHTb7CRvPMDxHl4+vEe0vEBeGIHGsmOJRuR/iICqPm4O EVV2A4x0ZCc5TAwdGZacyeJZN4chIW/BTlKDfyliCEnwjg0zpFwwH/uA+42EHd8y I0kD86BhN/9D89WjiLxgpVXGGw91AE1ZWVdopDtpePppq+gV4++KsDnaE0DapBg= =rJ+i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----