http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47444
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-24
22:21:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I didn't really follow in detail what we have been doing about these warnings,
> but submitter may have a point that the warning should not say "is above", and
> instead say something like "may be above". Manuel what do you think?
I think these warnings are exactly like uninitialized warnings. GCC can
sometimes prove that it happens but most of the time it can only be proved that
it "may" happen. Contrary to Wuninitialized, I am not sure that GCC analysis in
this warning is powerful enough to try to detect this difference, so I would
say, yes, using "may be" should be more appropriate.
But I think you better ask the corresponding maintainers, they are the ones
that will decide.
