http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47444
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-25 19:10:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > I really don't understand, why you guys so easily set wontfix to this bug. > Nobody cares that "inlining constructor" or "return instead throw" depends on > printing warning message? WONTFIX doesn't mean "nobody cares"
