http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-01-28 13:04:36 UTC --- > --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-28 > 12:45:43 UTC --- >> You're right: I somehow misread the PR and though the test had already >> been introduced in november last year. > > It did pass with GCC 4.3 on Solaris too so this is a regression. Can you > XFAIL > it on Solaris for the time being? Sure. The following patch does this: 2011-01-28 Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> * gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c: XFAIL on i?86-pc-solaris2.1[0-9] && ilp32. diff -r a1670fd752ff gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c Thu Jan 27 20:26:26 2011 +0100 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c Fri Jan 28 14:03:13 2011 +0100 @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -fpic" { target fpic } } */ +/* { dg-xfail-if "" { i?86-pc-solaris2.1[0-9] && ilp32 } } */ int f0 (int, int, int, int, int); int f1 (void); Ok for mainline (I'll post to gcc-patches anyway)? Rainer