http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29571
--- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-01-31 20:50:16 UTC --- Still, apparently it's a regression, thus, if we could identify which specific patch fixed it and it turned out to be small enough, we could consider applying it to 4_5-branch too, at least (if you ask me, I think it could also be closed right away, after all it's just an ICE on invalid).
