http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #33 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2011-02-03 13:57:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > So.... either > > 1/revert 163267 as proposed, > Are we sure that it has no effect on any other (esp. Java) test-cases? > I'll regression test option 1 today on darwin10. Isn't the current behavior (of not linking /usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib) allowing any duplicate symbols not protected by magic symbols to gotten from FSF's libgcc_s.1.dylib instead of libSystem? What is the desired behavior in that case?
