http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47792

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-18 
10:13:40 UTC ---
Great - I guess it's up to a gthreads maintainer whether they are happy to fix
the typo in the existing function name or want to fix it by adding a new
function

Reply via email to