> No, these are the only definitions for the particular testcase. Hmm, in every case it is GNU ld bug - the GNU ld internal ironly section should not be leaking to user warnings. Please fill in GNU ld PR.
Honza
- [Bug lto/48055] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execut... ubizjak at gmail dot com
- [Bug lto/48055] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execut... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug testsuite/48055] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/... ubizjak at gmail dot com
- [Bug testsuite/48055] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug testsuite/48055] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/... ubizjak at gmail dot com
- Re: [Bug testsuite/48055] FAIL: gcc.c-... Jan Hubicka
- [Bug testsuite/48055] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/... hubicka at ucw dot cz
- [Bug testsuite/48055] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/... ubizjak at gmail dot com
- [Bug testsuite/48055] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/... ubizjak at gmail dot com
