http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48055
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2011-03-10 14:39:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > No, these are the only definitions for the particular testcase. > Hmm, in every case it is GNU ld bug - the GNU ld internal ironly section > should > not be leaking > to user warnings. Please fill in GNU ld PR. Submitted as binutils PR 12564. Anyway, should the patch be committed to gcc testsuite, since it doesn't change the test and avoids the linker bug at the same time? [1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12564
