http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.03.12 13:11:18
Version|unknown |4.6.0
Summary|ICE on in(?)valid in |[C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid
|constexpr constructors |in constexpr constructors
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12
13:11:18 UTC ---
I guess an ICE is one way to solve the missing diagnostic for PR 18016 ;)
4.5 didn't ICE, but then constexpr was ignored so I'm not sure it counts as a
regression
