http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2011-04-06 22:51:26 UTC --- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/06/11 15:52, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389 > > --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-06 > 21:52:54 UTC --- > OK, not quite. We somehow have a barrier _inside_ a basic block, and that's > somehow a problem after the patch but not before?! I tried to warn you that it wasn't as easy as just moving hte call to rebuild_jump_labels :-) jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNnO5iAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7y1kH/R+nRv2iL79CgbPFxWYBTX44 6Fb7f72e6VdymlXu3xOSvkQ3em+4AdWzjay9o5UWRIQSFUuFgS41Yc9z/UR0uqQd OVwdX56kDFJaDfCX0XLjtddjiMN2js2jxiiXlGr1nq2sprWGFEabRxSmU6KqhN+Z hdrXH18h2nOe9KjVfshZrUgM80UxhykorjuWo7d+TBwARU21C051OSRwvAYr7I3o anYEBBzAvw2RzRyyUOVzVi24ErTyY+ZIn2wXJp9mIJmHKsdZMZCzYz4RGLysmnw5 gyzR6NsOU6st0K4SsLSqMWBIBddP5QI5Z+wEMiYUiu7Qto8lC3uE8xE3Edf7ja8= =2qbJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
