http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2011-04-07 18:41:14 UTC --- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/07/11 09:38, matz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389 > > Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |matz at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #7 from Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-07 > 15:38:38 UTC --- > Hmpf, what doesn't work with just moving the rebuild_jump_labels call? > The testcase works, but I haven't tried the testsuite. Because it should > theoretically work. The insertion of barrier inside BBs is fixed up in > cfgexpand at some places, we possibly merely need to extend them. See > maybe_cleanup_end_of_block. You won't even get an x86 bootstrap due to complaints in the verifiers. I agree, it should theoretically work :-) In practice it doesn't. jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNngU9AAoJEBRtltQi2kC7T3UH/017oZD3gx+/5jsNwcIsIiuc vjcenPjnNbR2gVFx2n65epQVfV7AC3nkBmJVYOCvpNCj9YHjLCURKp5Quy+uddsj V63r+HjRBoQO0goTgUG+1fXdehvFSeHSIIGvds//NtioNhdBC8N82l4FQfDwkD5f zBpddByDONoRfuHrcsfBHmNZDm9ymdeHEac4Lr8QBYBRnTN5j+fNfG7gBAqifEsf TaxNhK4kRN5nufASRJID1YOlZulrU0sQMgHnPkRKHajpDA8zAuYtdsTn7wFqaY7Y kDY3rrVL8Q25Cqvi+IGjYuhicdBM+e7LH4Y2/NnzKc4m7DApm8EZdaW8IM9PZBg= =YyHc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
