http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-27 13:08:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > PS: C++1x is private jargon, but well, as -std= argument, together with c++0x > we'll need something more realistic, at some point, don't you think? ;) At some point, yes: after the standard is ratified, at which point we won't need an 'x'. :)
