http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48978
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen <andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org> 2011-05-12 16:16:19 UTC --- I will try. BTW this was a much larger test case (allyesconfig), the tarball I sent you is a much more limited config. Normally noone uses allyesconfig kernels (they barely boot), but they are a good stress tester for the compiler. Still I suspect the hash table expansion algorithms are not optimal. If you're already in the GB range you shouldn't be doubling anymore...
