http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 10:59:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > + if (strcmp (e1->symtree->n.sym->name, e1->symtree->n.sym->name) != 0) > > That can be done quicker as: > if (e1->symtree->n.sym->name == e1->symtree->n.sym->name) > > well, not in the general case - but as long as "gfc_get_string" was used to > obtain the value. Can we be sure that this is the case? With the strcmp we should be on the safe side. And of course there is a typo above: One of the 'e1's should be an 'e2'!