http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39681
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-10-03 11:08:39 UTC --- Ok, thanks. Frankly I hadn't noticed the *second* error. The first one seemed good enough to me, and quite similar to what I saw elsewhere modulo type instead of type-specifier. So do you think it would be possible to get rid of the stupid second error message within the current infrastructure?
