http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51262
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com> 2011-12-09 03:25:17 UTC --- On 12/08/2011 11:46 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Dodji, Jason, can such anonymous name types ever have TYPE_DECL_ALIAS_P > set? They can't, but > - else if (CLASS_TYPE_P (t) && !TYPE_DECL_ALIAS_P (TYPE_NAME (t))) > + else if (CLASS_TYPE_P (t) > + && TYPE_NAME (t) && !TYPE_DECL_ALIAS_P (TYPE_NAME (t))) > return CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (t) > && PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE (t)); I would reverse the sense here so that the condition is satisfied by a null TYPE_NAME, since an anonymous union is a non-alias class. Jason
