http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 10:22:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > Doesn't powerpc-darwin have the same problem? Not sure if it defaults to > -fpic, perhaps just with explicit -fpic? powerpc makes provision (in the ABI) to save the pic reg in nested functions - so it might have a different/or no problem. > Are you ok with dropping the Regression tag I don't think this is a regression - I think it's been there for(ever/long time). (or, just xfailing the testcase on > *-darwin* for now with a reference to this PR) I guess xfailing is the thing to do for now - maybe give Mike a day or two in case there's a really easy fix. (it's not as simple as just doing that subtraction, as there is no guarantee that x uses or even saves the PIC reg as things stand) ... I am not familiar with how the non-local goto system works, so there's some reading for me to do before even cooking up a test...
