http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52138
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06
18:25:47 UTC ---
Why do you think inlining a ~ 750B long routine would be beneficial? Note that
if one of the operands has 0 either the imaginary or real part, gcc will inline
it.
