http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-11
09:15:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26640
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26640
gcc47-pr52209.patch
I don't think we need REDUCE_BIT_FIELD here, IMHO the old code was just fine
for the signed bitfields. Because then op0 will be either 0 or -1, NOT on it
turns it into -1 or 0 and REDUCE_BIT_FIELD would do nothing on that. Richard's
change was IMHO only needed for unsigned bitfields.
