http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2012-02-17 08:53:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I mean that the pseudo-code is not consistent with valid C/C++ when the > operands (`*ptr' and `value') are pointer types. I would think it's implied that the pointer values are automatically converted to uintptr_t and that the bit-twiddling or arithmetic is done on their uintptr_t representations.
