http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52283
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-20 15:59:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Related to PR37985, which is caused by the fix for PR26632, too. I still > think > that patch should possibly be reverted instead. I also think that patch should be reverted, and a proper fix for that bug be implemented instead by making the code that emits the warning smarter. I rather have that PR26632 reopen, and no hacks, than these recent ones. BTW, I cannot reproduce this bug in a recent trunk r184311.
