http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-01
20:47:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Author: jason
> Date: Thu Mar 1 17:52:12 2012
> New Revision: 184753
No new testcase?
+ input_location = location_of (declared_type);
+ warning (0, "attribute ignored in declaration of %q#T", declared_type);
+ warning (0, "attribute for %q#T must follow the %qs keyword",
+ declared_type, class_key_or_enum_as_string (declared_type));
+ input_location = loc;
Wouldn't it be simple and clearer to use warning_at(location) ?
And the second warning should be inform.
And given:
- if (decl_specifiers.attributes)
- warning (OPT_Wattributes,
- "attributes ignored on explicit type instantiation");
It is clear that the behavior is not equivalent. The warning before was
conditional on -Wattributes, but now it is unconditional. Was this intentional?
