http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53028
--- Comment #11 from Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net> 2012-04-30 01:08:24 UTC --- >> also don't test that the warning goes away with -w. We don't test the >> warning >> turns into an error with -Werror. > > Don't we? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01778.html Two comments. First, this, at most can test just one case, I mean, we don't test all cases. Second, I don't see -Werror anywhere. I don't see -w anywhere. Maybe I missed how these test these two options... > Perhaps we can devise an indirect > way to test that a warning is enabled by a certain option. We could have > { dg-warning-with-option "Wlong-long" "ISO C90 does not support 'long long'" > }, > which will match the option shown with -fdiagnostics-show-option. Can we at > least have this? I like the idea that we have a way to write one test case instead of three... I certainly won't object. > Fair enough. But the duplicated testcases are still being added! I'd rather error on the side of letting the FE people do what they want.
