http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-29 08:34:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > * Item 11: Define a copy constructor and an assignment operator for classes > with dynamically allocated memory. > > -Wcopy-resource-class IMHO this warning should just go. With deleted copy ctor/assign and move ctor/assign there are even more places where a hard and fast rule isn't useful. > * Item 12: Prefer initialization to assignment in constructors. > > -Wassignment-in-constructor If I ever get my -Wmeminit patch working properly it would provide this. > * Item 14: Make destructors virtual in base classes. > > Already covered by -Wnon-virtual-dtor And the more useful -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor > In summary, you could simulate exactly the behavior of -Weffc++ by turning on > each of these warnings individually, or you could turn on -Weffc++ and > selectively turn off a few warnings that you don't want. Yep, that would be much better
