Nobody have the answer ? I'm desperate ... :( miloutch wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a small problem. I am making a new pass for my gcc, and some of my > adds are deleted by optimization passes. > here is the code i add : > > t = builtin_decl_explicit (BUILT_IN_ACC_SETUPARGUMENT); > g = gimple_build_call(t, > 3, > build1(ADDR_EXPR, integer_ptr_type_node, length), > > build_int_cst(integer_type_node,TREE_INT_CST_LOW(TYPE_SIZE_UNIT > (TREE_TYPE (tmp_result)))), > offset > ); > gsi_insert_before (&gsi, g, GSI_SAME_STMT); > > you see, the variable length wich is actually "length.0" -> > gimple_omp_for_final() is renamed by ssa pass in length_1(D) > But, here is an ADDR_EXPR of length, and the optimization don't rename it, > so it points to the wrong variable because length.0 is not used anymore > after the optimizations. > > I want to know if there is a way to prevent the compiler from optimizing > this code with a flag in my code for example ? > Thanks in advance ! >
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-BUG-middle-end--Optimizations-are-deleting-my-adds-tp34012207p34028377.html Sent from the gcc - bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
