http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andi-gcc at firstfloor dot | |org --- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-04 09:27:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > > The testcase is fixed when using -fno-fat-lto-objects and gcc-ar > > For me x64_64-linux version works if I use gcc-ar (both with and without > -fno-fat-lto-objects). > > > (which is not required, or should not be required(?) for -ffat-lto-objects?) > > No idea, today is the first time I hear about gcc-nm/ar. Are there any online > docs? Are users supposed to create LTO archives with gcc-ar instead of good > ol' > ar these days? Good question, even I am not sure. This is an area that could have documentation. Honza, Andi, can you clarify?