http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
--- Comment #3 from badass at vt dot edu 2012-07-25 23:42:16 UTC --- Sorry about that, I though i had included the source code. I'm working on getting an updated compiler, but IT here is being difficult and I could take a day. Thanks for the help, source code is attached. -Benjamin A. Dassert On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:19 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096 > > Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING > Last reconfirmed| |2012-07-25 > CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org > Ever Confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-25 > 20:19:55 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #1) > > Please try a newer version of gfortran as 4.5.3 is fairly old. > > Especially for type-bound procedures and related features. For those, you > should use the current release 4.7.1 or the developer version 4.8 > > You find links to unofficial gfortran builds at: > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries > > (Cygwin.org does not seem to have a newer build; you might want to try the > MinGW/MinGW-w64 version.) > > > And as Steve wrote: It is nearly impossible to debug and fix compiler bugs > without a full example. > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug. >
