http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #160 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> 2012-12-13 09:52:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #159) > > hal/Hal.gcda: 96.72%: num counts=30069, min counter=16389 > > hal/Hal.gcda: 97.50%: num counts=35296, min counter=10241 > > hal/Hal.gcda: 98.28%: num counts=43669, min counter=6145 > > hal/Hal.gcda: 99.06%: num counts=59589, min counter=3072 > > hal/Hal.gcda: 99.90%: num counts=115840, min counter=320 > > > > So it looks like you would want a cutoff of 97.5% to get close to what > > was there before. > > Setting the default cutoff to something like 95% would sound fine to me. I > see i asked to reduce the parameter but suggested 990. Markus, can you > try setting HOT_BB_COUNT_WS_PERMILLE to 950? It doesn't help: HOT_BB_COUNT_WS_PERMILLE=950: size of libxul.so: 42149632 bytes (In reply to comment #157) > (Unfortunately this new ICE happens with yesterdays gcc when linking libxul: > > /var/tmp/mozilla-central/content/base/src/nsDocument.cpp: In member function > ‘CreateRange’: > /var/tmp/mozilla-central/content/base/src/nsDocument.cpp:4999:0: internal > compiler error: in cgraph_mark_address_taken_node, at cgraph.c:1409 > > I will open a new PR for this later.) See PR55669
