http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-18 22:47:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Actually the MIPS backend does have an UNSPEC 230. It is one of the > SYMBOL_64_* unspecs. Then, why is symbol_type not defined within define_c_enum "unspec"? That'd make the dumps easier to interpret, the name will be printed...