http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55836
--- Comment #2 from Lars Hamrén <hamren at sdu dot se> 2013-01-01 00:38:27 UTC --- > Why not just not use -Weffc++ for STL. I can turn it off locally using a pragma, but that is rather ugly. I like to have as many warning flags turned on as possible. Not having false warnings is a great help. > effc++ warnings are written from a book > and they don't always make sense really. But often they do. Why not give them special treatment when they occur in system headers? > > If the compiler were to set a pre-processor variable when -Weffc++ is in > > effect, adding virtual destructors could be made conditional. > > Then it would violate the one definition rule. Agreed. Bad idea.
