http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742
--- Comment #13 from Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google dot com> 2013-01-14 17:45:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Either use a different name of the attribute (replace target with mv_target > > or > > whatever), or require a new attribute (mv?) to be present for > > multi-versioning > > (mv attribute on any of the decls would enable it, if mv attribute isn't > > present on either of the two decls being merged, then the target attribute > > is > > merged as before 4.8). > > > I like this proposal: I too like just using a different attribute name. I will prepare a patch asap for this. Thanks Sri. > > >require a new attribute (mv?) to be present for multi-versioning > > (mv attribute on any of the decls would enable it, if mv attribute isn't > > present on either of the two decls being merged, then the target attribute > > is > > merged as before 4.8) > > > David
