http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #74 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-06 08:27:36 UTC --- > I do wonder when Apple introduced this problem. It was first reported with > Darwin 10, but GCC 4.6 and GNAT GPL 2011, 2012 (both based on GCC 4.5) don't > show the problem, so would we have known? Should the test be 10 <= version <12 Ideally we should try Iain's testcase on each version but, given that we made GCC releases with the unconditional workaround, it doesn't seem sensible to change the policy for earlier versions without a solid evidence. Tristan, any comments here?
