http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52872
--- Comment #7 from Karlson2k <k2k at narod dot ru> 2013-03-03 14:57:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Yes, patch looks reasonable. Please sent it to patch ML. > This patch is small, so it is ok, but do you have already made paper-work with > FSF for gcc? This patch is simple as possible, to be quickly get it. But there are some space to improvement (like using standard macros, properly redirect error output). I'm not sure is it worth to work on it. To answer your question: no. What should I do?
