http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-07 19:02:14 UTC --- It didn't seem to be too confusing and would require only a few extra lines of code (that have been written already). Anyway, I guess I don't care much, so if this works, go ahead and check it in. If you want, you might want to get rid of that ggc_free followed (almost) immediately by ggc_atomic_cleared.
