http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783



--- Comment #9 from Dick Guertin <dick.guertin at gmail dot com> 2013-03-30 
14:52:33 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #8)

> (In reply to comment #6)

> > First, my apology for not giving the gdp version.  I assume you meant this:

> > GNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-1515) (Sat Jan 15 08:33:48 UTC 
> > 2011)

> 

> Donate it to a museum and try a GDB version that was released this side of the

> last ice age.  GCC 4.5 and later require at least GDB 7.0:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html

> 

> This is not  GCC bug.



Johnathan, this may not be a GCC bug, but it isn't a GDB bug either.  I went

back to g++ 4.2 that came with the Xcode, which is where I started.  Of course,

the problem persists.  The "problem" is in the linked modules.  They don't

contain the paths back to the "source" modules.  "g++" compiles source into

objects; "ld" links objects into a link module, but knows about the sources. 

In Mac OS X 10.4.11, the linker places path-references back to sources.  In

10.5 and 10.6, it references back to objects.  When "gdb" reads the linked

module, it needs the sources to construct the "signatures" for the

symbol-table.  Paths to objects are worthless in this regard.  The fact that

"gdb" works properly with linked modules brought across from OS 10.4.11 (with

identical sources on identical paths), shows that the path-references to

sources is the key.  The latest "ld" is failing.



Of course, another problem would be the lack of sources when trying to "gdb"

the linked module.  I achieved that simply by renaming one of the directories

leading to the sources, and even my 10.4.11 linked module then failed to debug.

Reply via email to