http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Fuka <vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com> 2013-04-16 17:40:04 UTC --- Thanks, I didn't realize they might be connected. I even forgotten I have this bug opened when I asked. Vladimir Dne 16.4.2013 19:17 "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> napsal(a): > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386 > > Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Keywords| |rejects-valid > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Last reconfirmed| |2013-04-16 > CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org > Ever Confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-16 > 17:17:52 UTC --- > Related test case by the bug reporterm > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/UvBX1kfuFqs > > > This time rejecting the code instead of ICEing: > > print *,x%i > 1 > Error: Symbol 'x' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type > > > > program p > type t > integer :: i = 0 > end type > > associate (x=>f()) > print *,x%i > end associate > > contains > function f() > type(t) f > f%i = 5 > end function > end program > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You reported the bug. >
