http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4) > I've probably missed the bigger picture here, but FWIW, I don't > see any problem with extending *mov<GPR:mode>_on_<MOVECC:mode> > to QI and HI. I suppose it would just be a case of replacing > GPR in that pattern with a new iterator. Er, to be clear: I mean doing that on top of anything else that might be needed. Andrew's patch still looks good too.
