http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #38 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> --- Richard, I've split up the patch as requested: Part 1 was posted here, but not yet approved: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg01292.html Just for the record, part 1 has been bootstrapped and regression tested. For part 2: For simplicity I'd propose to use simply pass EXPAND_MEMORY here. These misaligned uses are quite rare hopefully. I will replace my test cases 3+4 with Martin's test case, maybe without the get_i() because otherwise the test will die from the ICE before the check runs. Will do this after Part 1 if you agree...
