http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463 > > --- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos <pa...@matos-sorge.com> --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote: > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463 > > > > > > --- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos <pa...@matos-sorge.com> --- > > > Backporting fixes the problem. Can we go ahead and backport to 4.8? > > > > Feel free to do the backport - I don't have time for it right now. > > > > Richard. > > Sure, no problem. If by doing the backport you mean sending the relevant > patches to gcc-patches then I will do that today. Yes. Thanks, Richard.
