http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
--- Comment #20 from Michi Henning <michi at triodia dot com> --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #19) > I'm pretty sure it isn't. It's easy to see why: in the testcase are you > using *all* the facilities provided by std::shared_ptr as standardized? I > don't think so! Thus just imagine having the class there, and commenting out > all the member functions you don't use. Likewise for the free functions. > Also, including <memory> means *a ton* of code which definitely has > *nothing* to do with std::shared_ptr. Normally, a C++ testcase is less than > 100 lines without includes. The exceptions are *extremely* rare. I'm not really sure what else to do here. The code in total only contains constructors and destructors. Just looking again, I forgot to delete a #include for <string> in ExceptionImplBase, and I guess I could have deleted the namespaces as well. I'm pretty sure that I'm not using anything in shared_ptr that's outside the standard, and the standard way to get access to shared_ptr is to include <memory>. If I include something else, I end up in implementation territory, don't I? So, what should I do to get the bug report up to scratch? (I've already spent quite a few hours cutting this down to what it is now from a large project.)
