http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57554
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2013-10-30 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I see it passing without adding -funroll-loops. I suppose 176.gcc contains undefined behavior - does it work with adding -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations?