http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57554

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-10-30
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I see it passing without adding -funroll-loops.  I suppose 176.gcc contains
undefined behavior - does it work with adding
-fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations?

Reply via email to