http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> > No this testcase is not valid at all. See
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/Empty-Structures.html#Empty-
> > Structures where it is documented it is not valid.
>
> That only documents that sizeof is different for C and C++, the calling
> convention should be the same. And it seems like classify_argument should
> already be returning 1 with classes[0]==NO_CLASS for both C and C++. Why
> are we getting different results?
X86 backend has some issues. But the C/C++ calling convention issue
affects most, if not all, targets. You can try the test case in
comment 4 on non-x86 targets.
