http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > does former_clone_of apply recursively? Thus can we have a clone of a clone? > Is there a way to "pretty-print" the kind of clone? That is, say > <clone with foo = 1> for a ipa-cp clone with parameter foo replaced by 1? Why would you want to do that? At least for diagnostics to the users (not debug dumps), that the function is a clone is an internal implementation detail.